Obviously, I am a lot more proficient in my current tool, Darktable, than in any of the others. I would prefer a file-based workflow with edits stored alongside the RAW files 2, and I would prefer a perpetual license instead of a rental contract, but I'm willing to compromize on both if it's worth it 3. I have yet to see a photograph that was ruined by them, and most RAW developers seem to do a sufficient job at them. In contrast to most other comparisons on the 'net 1, I won't concern myself too much with sharpness and noise reduction and demosaicing. Must support my past and present cameras (Fuji X-E3, Ricoh GR, Pentax Q7, Nikon D7000).Must run acceptably with files on a network share.Must run acceptably on my Surface tablet.And they all have rabid fan bases, and apparently unique rendering. There are so many RAW developers out there. I do not have any plans to stop using darktable, but I will continue to play with ART during The Shutdown.Choice. On the whole I am pleased with what ART has to offer. Here is a blog post and a thread from a DPReview forum. There are a handful of video tutorials, but most of them do not have audio. There is no written manual, but the Rawpedia manual is a starting point. It took me about an hour to learn to use it, and most of that time was spent figuring out the menus. ![]() I also use the GIMP AppImage, and the two play very nicely together. I think the interface is well designed and easy to use, and GIMP works pretty much seamlessly as the external editor. darktable and RT have more features, but ART has all of the functions I regularly use. The Pandemic Shutdown has given me some time to play with ART, and I really like what I see.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |